Skip to content
Skip to content

Independent e-magazine

the OUTSPOKEN digest

The Lancet Launches Its First Men's Health Series in Liverpool Today, Arguing That Biology Is Not Why Men Die Younger

Three papers published last week say men lose 16 percent more healthy years than women, that social and commercial forces drive most of the gap, and that few countries have a men's health policy.

Outspoken Digest Health Desk

Thursday, November 5, 2026/3 min read

The red-brick and stone front of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine with its name in gold letters above the ground floor, in an undated file photograph of the building and not of Thursday's launch
Photo: John Bradley via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

At 12:30 GMT today, in the Nuffield lecture theatre of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, a panel of researchers will formally launch something The Lancet has never published before: a series devoted entirely to the health of men. The three papers appeared online at the end of October, and the Liverpool event, chaired by LSTM's Sally Theobald with the journal's senior editor Jonathan Pimm, is the public argument for them.

The argument is not that men are neglected victims. It is that men worldwide die earlier and lose more healthy years than women, that this is mostly not a matter of biology, and that almost no government has a plan for it.

What does the Lancet men's health series say?

The series has three parts. The first proposes a framework that combines intersectionality with syndemic theory, using case studies such as cardiovascular disease and cancer among racially minoritised men in North America to show how racism and other structural forces interact with ideas of masculinity. The second analyses Global Burden of Disease data on how and when men die, finding that non-communicable disease, mental ill health and external injuries fall disproportionately on marginalised men. The third turns that into policy, arguing for men's health to be built into universal health coverage and for better data on the men most at risk. That is how the University of Pennsylvania described it on Wednesday, announcing that Penn Nursing's Derek Griffith, who directs its Program for Research on Men's Health, is a co-author. Griffith's line is blunt: biology, behaviour and masculinities matter, but they are not the main drivers of men's health.

The headline numbers come from the Global Burden of Disease. Disability-adjusted life years, the healthy years lost to illness, injury and early death, were 16 percent higher among males than females in 2023, according to Medical Daily's summary of the series, and Spanish experts reacting to the papers through Science Media Centre Spain cited an age-standardised male death rate 38 percent above the female rate. In the United States, a boy born in 2024 could expect 76.5 years against 81.4 for a girl, a 4.9 year gap that had narrowed from 5.3 the year before as men's life expectancy recovered faster.

Why do men die younger if not because of biology?

The authors' answer is employment, education, poverty, discrimination, incarceration and homelessness, plus two things they single out: rigid masculinity norms that keep men away from clinics, and commercial pressure on what men eat, drink and buy. Men are more likely than women to die of cancer, heart, lung, kidney and liver disease, opioid overdose, alcohol, suicide, accidents, firearms and assault, and in the US the lowest life expectancies belong to Black, Indigenous and rural men. The series author Vittal Katikireddi of the University of Glasgow has said the pattern shows men's health needs addressing within health policy rather than treated as a private matter of behaviour.

The reaction has been broadly warm but not uncritical. Isabel Aguilar of the University of Zaragoza questioned whether men's health has really been invisible when the male body has long been medicine's default, while Jorge Marcos Marcos of the University of Alicante, who reviewed one of the papers, welcomed the attention and stressed the inequalities among men. All sides, including the authors, insist a gendered approach is not a zero-sum contest with women's health.

Which countries have a men's health policy?

Very few. Ireland adopted the first national men's health policy in 2008 and only a handful of countries have followed. The series warns that the vacuum is being filled by companies and by online "manosphere" influencers, who are happy to tell young men what a healthy life looks like when no health ministry will. The policy paper's ask is modest by comparison: count marginalised men properly, design services they will actually use, and write men into universal coverage plans.

This is reporting on a set of review papers and policy arguments, not clinical research, and nothing here is medical advice. Decisions about screening, treatment or lifestyle change belong with a clinician who knows your history; the series itself changes no screening guideline anywhere. What it may change, if the Liverpool launch lands, is whether governments think men's early deaths are a policy problem at all. The next sign will be whether any health ministry outside Ireland answers.

Published in The Outspoken Digest

Editorial desk

Outspoken Digest Health Desk

Medicine, public health and the research behind the headlines, read carefully.

Newsletter

The Digest, in your inbox

One edition, sent when it is ready. No noise, and your address is never passed on.

We send a confirmation first. One click to leave, always.

Share this story

the OUTSPOKEN digest

Beyond boundaries. Independent stories on technology, culture, and the trends shaping how we live.